One More Political Post

I’ll try to make this my last political post in a place that’s supposed to be fun. It’s such a crucial issue that I can’t go blithely on with my nonsense before addressing it. And I’m talking to the Americans with this post, so if you’re not a Yank, it won’t hurt my feelings if you don’t read further.

No matter your political ideology, there is a problem which must be addressed in the U.S., and the class warfare being waged is not helping.

I like the way Michael Arrington presents it here:

“Huge tax cuts for the rich”

An addendum to my notes from yesterday.

One of the big talking points for people is the notion that the Republicans want to “sharply cut social services for the poor to pay for huge tax cuts for the rich.”

example

This talking point really works, because everyone knows the Republicans want to rework entitlements and they don’t like raising taxes on the rich. People get really pissed thinking about it. Rich people want a new ferrari or something, so some dirt poor family has to go without shoes.

But anyone who says this is either completely misinformed or (worse) dishonest. Most of my friends here in San Francisco are one of these.

And this is the kind of dishonesty that is really going to make the final reckoning a
whole lot more painful.

read the rest here

And if this just isn’t hip enough to hold your attention, perhaps you can spend time checking out the lofty summit which may have taken place between Julian Assange and Lady Gaga. Definitely more fun to contemplate and honestly, to make fun of, but my will is not cooperating this morning.

Wait. I can’t resist:

Click for the story

Man, if there’s anything Gaga knows, it’s a photo op.

Pardon me if I file this one under “who gives a damn.”

Should I even mention our guy’s name? I think I’ll leave him out of this one.

Tangent — Troll of the Century

If you’ve landed here looking for a serious piece, then don’t let that picture above deceive you into thinking this is merely a blog about that gorgeous specimen. Although it’s easy to stare at him without having any thought of politics. Oh, God no, let’s not talk politics while looking at that picture as this would defame his image. So just keep your eyes firmly affixed on my words.

Supposedly Julian Assange of Wikileaks desires open government. Strange way to go about it. Surely there are times in history when unorthodox means are needed to shake up the stagnant status quo, and government does need more transparency. But does Assange really think that exposing the confidential commuinques of governments to this degree is going to accomplish that? If anything, it’s creating an atmosphere of distrust which is certainly not conducive to openness.

Of course there is a theory that this is all a setup, and the information was purposely released in order to manipulate. That’s what my gut is fairly screaming. Plus, this is a much more plausible scenario than some hacker with altruistic intentions. Pardon me while I snort.

But since I cannot be entirely sure of this being a setup, I’m inclined to think he’s a troll. Jimmy Wales’ description of trolls on Wikipedia is apt (emphasis mine):

Trolling is any deliberate and intentional attempt to disrupt the usability of Wikipedia for its editors, administrators, developers, and other people who work to create content for and help run Wikipedia. Trolling is a violation of the implicit rules of Internet social spaces and is often done to inflame or invite conflict. It necessarily involves a value judgment made by one user about the value of another’s contribution. (Because of this it is considered not to be any more useful than the judgment ‘I don’t agree with you’ by many users, who prefer to focus on behaviors instead of on presumed intent). Not to be confused with large warty monsters thought to dwell under bridges, in caves etc.

Trolling is not necessarily the same as vandalism (although vandalism may be used to troll). A vandal may just enjoy defacing a webpage, insulting random users, or spreading some personal views in an inappropriate way. A troll deliberately exploits tendencies of human nature or of an online community to upset people.

There are many types of disruptive users that are not trolls. Reversion warriors, POV warriors, cranks, impolite users, and vocal critics of Wikipedia structures and processes are not necessarily trolls.

The basic mindset of a troll is that they are far more interested in how others react to their edits than in the usual concerns of Wikipedians: accuracy, veracity, comprehensiveness, and overall quality. If a troll gets no response to their spurious edits, then they can hardly be considered a troll at all.

I would bet Julian Assange is feeling mighty fine right now. He’s probably never felt more alive.

And now I must remember the cardinal rule concerning trolls.